Culture and law collide with one another. They intersect.
Each chooses to stand next to the other, at a mutual distance, and so a point
is created at which culture and law diverge, converge, or even defy one
another.
We must ask how long law been established with
respect to each culture. Many countries have corrupt or nonexistent government
and, so, they also have less than sophisticated legal systems. Reprehensible
acts go unpunished, without consequence to anything but the soul. The people
become desensitized. The soul, like cracked earth, splinters in the drought. Indistinct
and infiltrated, such government is far more permeable than culture. And so brews a bold, brazen blend of the safety in numbers faction.
Though, safety in this context is guised
as freedom from consequence, abating the conscience and soothing the soul. Freedom
from conscience is potent and destructive, pumping not a pulse for the bleeding
heart but a poison into it.
Mass murdering movements
have propelled eras of moral destitution. Other such condemnable acts are often
loud, though muffled, unseen, and unheard. Moral codes are then degraded to justifiable
ethics. Remember: if you must justify something, there is a reason why it
should not be. Indeed, not all cultures imbibe morals, though each broods over its
own ethics, serving to depreciate true integrity. Integrity, as not yet defined, is more than
just consistent behavior. Integrity is a protagonist standing firm and fighting
for principles. Integrity spars fairly
and with valor; it admits defeat and realizes weakness. It does not exploit the weakness of others. To have integrity is to fully internalize the effects of all actions and beliefs. At
its core, integrity is the ability to swim against a current, so long as its mode of survival does not move towards its own extinction. In the context of culture, integrity is sustainable, cultivating, and altruistic.
If we assume that culture defines morals, laws are simply
deterrents. If law is not strict, culture
can be unscrupulous, self-preserving, and callous. Law that is set in place around the time of a
culture’s inception is an attempt to align the motives of its people. This creates a moral code, which is sometimes
accepted into the law. This code, these characteristics of culture – humanity,
survival, preservation, and violence – become entangled with law. Culture and
law can have a symbiotic relationship
but can also have one of measured defiance. And though we bend to authority, we
flex as a people. We shift like glaciers but with the earth-shattering capacity
of tectonic plates. Culture is indelible to law.